Comments on Point:Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia induces/does not induce different responses from normobaric hypoxia.

نویسندگان

  • Olivier Girard
  • Michael S Koehle
  • Martin J MacInnis
  • Jordan A Guenette
  • Samuel Verges
  • Thomas Rupp
  • Marc Jubeau
  • Stephane Perrey
  • Guillaume Y Millet
  • Robert F Chapman
  • Benjamin D Levine
  • Johnny Conkin
  • James H Wessel
  • Hugo Nespoulet
  • Bernard Wuyam
  • Renaud Tamisier
  • Patrick Levy
  • Darren P Casey
  • Bryan J Taylor
  • Eric M Snyder
  • Bruce D Johnson
  • Abigail S Laymon
  • Jonathon L Stickford
  • Joshua C Weavil
  • Jack A Loeppky
  • Matiram Pun
  • Kai Schommer
  • Peter Bartsch
  • Mary C Vagula
  • Charles F Nelatury
چکیده

TO THE EDITOR: Decades of research in exercise physiology have supported the common view that endurance performance suffers most greatly at altitude because oxidative energy production is limited (4). In contrast, Weyand et al. (5) reported that fit males are capable of running just as fast during “all-out” treadmill efforts of 1 min in hypoxic compared with normoxic conditions (13.00% and 20.93% oxygen, respectively), despite a reduction in the aerobic energy available for sprinting. As underlined by Mounier and Brugniaux (2) in their Counterpoint, it is noteworthy that most of our knowledge on this topic is derived from laboratory-based measurements. When comparing hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia, the effect of air resistance should not be neglected. Indeed, the decrease in air density upon ascent to terrestrial (natural) altitude reduces air resistance, which is likely to decrease the energy cost of running at high velocities, without the detrimental effect of reducing energy availability (3). This may explain—to a large extent—why sprinters generally achieve better performances with exposure to natural altitude. Anecdotally, multiple world records were set in the sprint (i.e. 100, 200, and 400 m) disciplines during the Mexico City Olympics held at an altitude of 2,240 m in 1968, whereas no records were set in the middleor long-distance running disciplines. By using a mathematical supply-demand model, Arsac (1) calculated improvements in sprinting (i.e. 60, 100 m) times and changes in the components of the energy cost with changes in altitude from 0 to 4,000 m. It was concluded that as the cost of overcoming air resistance decreases with increasing altitude, better performances may be achieved attributable to more energy being available for acceleration. In summary, it should be underlined that the reduced air resistance with terrestrial altitude (hypobaric hypoxia) is likely to induce different responses than exposure to gas mixtures lowering the oxygen fraction (normobaric hypoxia) during running sprints. Of the few studies modeling the effects of natural altitude on the energetics of sprint performance, to date, no study has directly assessed the impact of a reduced air resistance per se, which warrants further research.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comments on Point:Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia induces/does not induce different responses from normobaric hypoxia REDUCED AIR RESISTANCE WITH TERRESTRIAL ALTITUDE ALTERS RUN SPRINT PERFORMANCE

TO THE EDITOR: Decades of research in exercise physiology have supported the common view that endurance performance suffers most greatly at altitude because oxidative energy production is limited (4). In contrast, Weyand et al. (5) reported that fit males are capable of running just as fast during “all-out” treadmill efforts of 1 min in hypoxic compared with normoxic conditions (13.00% and 20.9...

متن کامل

Last word on Point: Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia induces different responses from normobaric hypoxia.

TO THE EDITOR: We thank the authors of the comments (see Ref. 1) who contributed their thoughts to this debate (3, 5). Many additional interesting arguments were provided, and most of the comments are in line with our view that hypobaric hypoxia induces different physiological responses from normobaric hypoxia but also that the underlying mechanisms and clinical/ practical relevance have not ye...

متن کامل

Last word on Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia does not induce different physiological responses from normobaric hypoxia.

TO THE EDITOR: First, we would like to thank all the authors who contributed to make this a rigorous and thorough debate (see Ref. 2). As expected, we can note some very strong opinions and diverging points of view among the contributors even from the same institution or within members of the same family!!! We believe this diversity in the commentaries reflects the complexity of the question an...

متن کامل

Point: Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia induces/does not induce different responses from normobaric hypoxia POINT: HYPOBARIC HYPOXIA INDUCES DIFFERENT PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES FROM NORMOBARIC HYPOXIA

Hypoxia is defined as any combination of reduced barometric pressure (PB) and/or a reduced inspired fraction of oxygen (FIO2), which ultimately results in an inspired partial pressure of oxygen (PIO2) less than 150 mmHg (6). Pathophysiological responses to hypoxia or adaptations to hypoxic training can be investigated in two different types of exposure: hypobaric hypoxia (HH; FIO2 20.9%; PB 760...

متن کامل

Acute mountain sickness, chemosensitivity, and cardiorespiratory responses in humans exposed to hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia.

We examined the control of breathing, cardiorespiratory effects, and the incidence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in humans exposed to hypobaric hypoxia (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH), and under two control conditions [hypobaric normoxia (HN) and normobaric normoxia (NN)]. Exposures were 6 h in duration, and separated by 2 wk between hypoxic exposures and 1 wk between normoxic exposures. Be...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of applied physiology

دوره 112 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012